ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

Difference-in-Means Estimator×Audit Experiment×
领域Political SciencePolitical Science
方法族Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
起源年份19232011
提出者Jerzy Neyman (design-based potential-outcomes framework)Butler & Broockman (political responsiveness audits); Bertrand & Mullainathan (correspondence-audit lineage)
类型Design-based estimator of the average treatment effectRandomized field experiment using matched fictitious requests
开创性文献Gerber, A. S., & Green, D. P. (2012). Field Experiments: Design, Analysis, and Interpretation. New York: W. W. Norton. ISBN: 9780393979954Butler, D. M., & Broockman, D. E. (2011). Do Politicians Racially Discriminate Against Constituents? A Field Experiment on State Legislators. American Journal of Political Science, 55(3), 463–477. DOI ↗
别名Neyman estimator, Design-based ATE estimator, Difference of sample means, Mean-difference treatment effect estimatorCorrespondence study, Field audit study, Discrimination audit, Responsiveness audit
相关44
摘要The difference-in-means estimator is the design-based workhorse for analyzing randomized experiments: it estimates the average treatment effect simply as the difference between the average outcome among treated units and the average outcome among control units. Rooted in Jerzy Neyman's potential-outcomes framework and central to modern treatments by Imbens and Rubin and by Gerber and Green, it is unbiased under randomization, comes with a conservative Neyman variance estimator, and supports exact randomization inference, requiring no model of how outcomes are generated.An audit experiment, also called a correspondence or field audit study, sends matched but fictitious requests to real-world targets — such as legislators, landlords, or employers — while randomizing a single treatment cue, then compares the rate and quality of responses. In political science the canonical design follows Butler and Broockman's 2011 study of U.S. state legislators, which varied the putative race signaled by a constituent's name to measure discrimination in responsiveness.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Difference-in-Means Estimator · Audit Experiment. 于 2026-06-24 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare