ScholarGate
助手
Process / pipelineField experimental designs

Audit Experiment

An audit experiment, also called a correspondence or field audit study, sends matched but fictitious requests to real-world targets — such as legislators, landlords, or employers — while randomizing a single treatment cue, then compares the rate and quality of responses. In political science the canonical design follows Butler and Broockman's 2011 study of U.S. state legislators, which varied the putative race signaled by a constituent's name to measure discrimination in responsiveness.

在 MethodMind 中打开即将推出应用、比较、获取指导
工具与资源
下载幻灯片
学习与探索
视频即将推出

阅读完整方法

仅限会员

使用免费账户登录即可阅读本节。

登录

方法图谱

相关方法的邻域——选择一个节点以展开探索。

来源

  1. Butler, D. M., & Broockman, D. E. (2011). Do Politicians Racially Discriminate Against Constituents? A Field Experiment on State Legislators. American Journal of Political Science, 55(3), 463–477. DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-5907.2011.00515.x
  2. Bertrand, M., & Mullainathan, S. (2004). Are Emily and Greg More Employable Than Lakisha and Jamal? A Field Experiment on Labor Market Discrimination. American Economic Review, 94(4), 991–1013. DOI: 10.1257/0002828042002561

如何引用本页

ScholarGate. (2026, June 22). Audit Experiment (Correspondence / Field Audit Study). ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/zh/political-science/audit-experiment

选用哪种方法?

将本方法与其最相近的同类并置,并排研读——本馆将书籍铺陈于案上,取舍则由您定夺。

并排比较

被引用于

ScholarGateAudit Experiment (Audit Experiment (Correspondence / Field Audit Study)). 于 2026-06-24 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/political-science/audit-experiment · 数据集: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20539026