ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

定义排序标准之间的相互关系×加法比率评估×
领域决策决策
方法族MCDMMCDM
起源年份20212010
提出者Pamučar, D., Žižović, M., Marinković, D., Doljanica, D.Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z.
类型Ranked criteria interrelationship weighting (non-pairwise sequential)Additive utility ratio (optimal reference row)
开创性文献Pamučar, D., Žižović, M., Marinković, D., Doljanica, D. (2021). Development of an alternative approach for the selection of suppliers under the conditions of fuzzy sets. Symmetry link ↗Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z. (2010). A new additive ratio assessment (ARAS) method in multicriteria decision-making. Technological and Economic Development of Economy link ↗
别名
相关88
摘要DIBR (Defining Interrelationships Between Ranked criteria) is a weight subjective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Pamučar, D., Žižović, M., Marinković, D., Doljanica, D. in 2021. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.ARAS (Additive Ratio Assessment) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z. in 2010. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 1 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: DIBR · ARAS. 于 2026-06-17 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare