ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

德尔菲法×AHPSort×加法比率评估×
领域决策决策决策
方法族MCDMMCDMMCDM
起源年份196320122010
提出者Dalkey, N., Helmer, O.Ishizaka, A., Nemery, P., Pearman, C.Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z.
类型Weight_Subjective (expert consensus, iterative Likert/ranking)AHP-based sorting with limiting or central profilesAdditive utility ratio (optimal reference row)
开创性文献Dalkey, N., Helmer, O. (1963). An experimental application of the Delphi method to the use of experts. Management Science DOI ↗Ishizaka, A., Nemery, P., Pearman, C. (2012). AHPSort: An AHP-based method for sorting problems. International Journal of Production Research DOI ↗Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z. (2010). A new additive ratio assessment (ARAS) method in multicriteria decision-making. Technological and Economic Development of Economy link ↗
别名
相关888
摘要DELPHI (Delphi Method — iterative expert consensus for criterion importance elicitation) is a weight subjective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Dalkey, N., Helmer, O. in 1963. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.AHPSORT (AHPSort — AHP-based classification of alternatives into ordered categories) is a sorting multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Ishizaka, A., Nemery, P., Pearman, C. in 2012. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.ARAS (Additive Ratio Assessment) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z. in 2010. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 1 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: DELPHI · AHPSORT · ARAS. 于 2026-06-19 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare