方法对比
并排查看您选择的方法；存在差异的行会高亮显示。
| 因果识别（使用do演算）× | 中介分析× | |
|---|---|---|
| 领域≠ | 因果推断 | 统计学 |
| 方法族≠ | Regression model | Hypothesis test |
| 起源年份≠ | 2009 | 1986 |
| 提出者≠ | Judea Pearl | Baron & Kenny |
| 类型≠ | Causal identification framework | Indirect effects / path test |
| 开创性文献≠ | Pearl, J. (2009). Causality: Models, Reasoning, and Inference (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press. ISBN: 978-0521895606 | Baron, R. M. & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173–1182. link ↗ |
| 别名 | do-calculus, backdoor adjustment, Pearl causal identification, DAG ile Nedensel Tanımlama (do-calculus) | indirect effects analysis, path-based mediation, PROCESS macro mediation, Aracılık Analizi (Mediation / PROCESS) |
| 相关 | 5 | 5 |
| 摘要≠ | DAG causal identification is a framework, developed by Judea Pearl (2009), that encodes causal assumptions as a directed acyclic graph and uses the do-calculus rules to determine whether and how a causal effect can be identified from observational data. It systematically handles confounders, instrumental variables, and backdoor paths. | Mediation analysis is a statistical procedure that tests whether the effect of an independent variable X on an outcome Y operates wholly or partly through a third variable M, called the mediator. Formalised by Baron and Kenny in 1986, it decomposes the total effect of X on Y into a direct path (c′) and an indirect path (a × b), quantifying how much of the relationship is carried by the mediating mechanism. |
| ScholarGate数据集 ↗ |
|
|