ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

交叉对照组实验设计×交叉随机对照试验×
领域实验设计实验设计
方法族Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
起源年份Mid-20th century; systematic treatment from 1980s onward1960s (Grizzle 1965 for statistical foundations); widely used in clinical research since the 1970s
提出者Established in clinical pharmacology and agricultural research; formalized by B. Jones & M. G. KenwardEarly formalized by statisticians including Bradford Hill and colleagues in clinical trials; theoretical framework developed by Grizzle (1965) and later Senn (2002)
类型Experimental designExperimental within-subject design
开创性文献Jones, B., & Kenward, M. G. (2003). Design and Analysis of Cross-Over Trials (2nd ed.). Chapman and Hall/CRC. ISBN: 978-1584883500Senn, S. (2002). Cross-over Trials in Clinical Research (2nd ed.). Wiley. ISBN: 978-0471496533
别名crossover controlled trial, within-subject crossover with control, AB/BA crossover controlled design, repeated-measures crossover with control armcrossover RCT, crossover trial, within-subject RCT, AB/BA crossover design
相关65
摘要A crossover control group experimental design is an experimental approach in which participants are randomly assigned to sequences of conditions that include both a treatment and a control (no-treatment or placebo) period, with each participant experiencing both the experimental and control conditions in succession. By using each participant as their own control across periods, this design sharply reduces between-subject variability and typically requires fewer participants than parallel group trials to achieve equivalent statistical power.A crossover randomized controlled trial (crossover RCT) is an experimental design in which each participant receives all study interventions in a randomized sequence, separated by a washout period. Because every participant serves as their own control, within-subject variability is eliminated from the treatment comparison, yielding greater statistical power per participant than a parallel-group RCT of equal size.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Crossover Control Group Experimental Design · Crossover Randomized Controlled Trial. 于 2026-06-18 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare