方法对比
并排查看您选择的方法；存在差异的行会高亮显示。
| 批判性思维倾向量表× | 学术自我效能感量表× | |
|---|---|---|
| 领域 | 教育心理学 | 教育心理学 |
| 方法族 | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| 起源年份≠ | 1992 | 1977 |
| 提出者≠ | Peter Facione | Albert Bandura |
| 类型≠ | Critical thinking propensity measurement | Self-efficacy belief measurement |
| 开创性文献≠ | Facione, P. A., Facione, N. C., & Giancarlo, C. A. F. (1992). The California Critical Thinking Disposition Inventory. Insight Assessment, Millbrae, CA. link ↗ | Bandura, A. (1977). Self-Efficacy: Toward a Unifying Theory of Behavioral Change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191-215. DOI ↗ |
| 别名≠ | CTDS, California Critical Thinking Disposition Inventory, CCTDI | ASES, Self-Efficacy for Academic Performance |
| 相关 | 4 | 4 |
| 摘要≠ | The Critical Thinking Dispositions Scale (CTDS), exemplified by the California Critical Thinking Disposition Inventory (CCTDI), measures the extent to which individuals exhibit cognitive dispositions conducive to critical thinking. Developed by Facione (1992), it assesses dimensions including truth-seeking, open-mindedness, analytical orientation, self-confidence, systematic approach, and inquisitiveness. Critical thinking dispositions—the habits of mind and values that support rigorous reasoning—are distinct from but complementary to critical thinking skills. | The Academic Self-Efficacy Scale (ASES) measures students' beliefs about their capability to succeed in academic tasks. Grounded in Bandura's social cognitive theory, the instrument assesses perceived competence in diverse academic domains—understanding lectures, completing assignments, performing on exams, and engaging in scholarly work. High academic self-efficacy is a strong predictor of achievement, persistence, and resilience in the face of academic challenges. |
| ScholarGate数据集 ↗ |
|
|