方法对比
并排查看您选择的方法；存在差异的行会高亮显示。
| 批判性隐喻分析× | 批判性内容分析× | |
|---|---|---|
| 领域 | 质性 | 质性 |
| 方法族 | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| 起源年份≠ | 2004 | 1980s–2000s (consolidated in practice by the 1990s–2000s) |
| 提出者≠ | Jonathan Charteris-Black | Building on Krippendorff (1980) and Altheide (1996); synthesised through critical theory traditions (Frankfurt School, feminist and race critical scholars) |
| 类型≠ | Qualitative-critical textual analysis | Qualitative analytical approach |
| 开创性文献≠ | Charteris-Black, J. (2004). Corpus Approaches to Critical Metaphor Analysis. Palgrave Macmillan. ISBN: 978-1403932921 | Altheide, D. L. (1996). Qualitative Media Analysis. Sage. ISBN: 978-0803970892 |
| 别名 | CMA, critical metaphor research, corpus-based critical metaphor analysis, ideological metaphor analysis | CCA, critical textual analysis, ideological content analysis, critical qualitative content analysis |
| 相关 | 5 | 5 |
| 摘要≠ | Critical Metaphor Analysis (CMA) is a qualitative method for uncovering how metaphorical language constructs, legitimises, or contests power relations and ideological positions in texts. Developed by Jonathan Charteris-Black (2004), it integrates Conceptual Metaphor Theory with the evaluative concerns of Critical Discourse Analysis to reveal the persuasive and ideological work performed by metaphors in political, institutional, and media discourse. | Critical content analysis is a qualitative approach that examines texts, media, and documents not merely for manifest meaning but for how they construct, reinforce, or contest relations of power, ideology, race, gender, and class. Grounded in critical theory traditions, it asks whose interests a text serves, what voices are silenced, and how language and representation naturalise dominant worldviews. It combines systematic analytic rigour with an explicitly emancipatory or transformative research stance. |
| ScholarGate数据集 ↗ |
|
|