ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

反事实影响评估 (CIE)×合成控制法 (SCM)×
领域因果推断因果推断
方法族Regression modelRegression model
起源年份1970s–2000s2003–2010
提出者Heckman, Imbens, Rubin, and the program evaluation literatureAlberto Abadie & Javier Gardeazabal (2003); Abadie, Diamond & Hainmueller (2010)
类型Causal inference / program evaluationQuasi-experimental causal inference
开创性文献Heckman, J. J., & Vytlacil, E. J. (2007). Econometric evaluation of social programs, Part I: Causal models, structural models and econometric policy evaluation. Handbook of Econometrics, 6B, 4779-4874. DOI ↗Abadie, A., Diamond, A., & Hainmueller, J. (2010). Synthetic Control Methods for Comparative Case Studies: Estimating the Effect of California's Tobacco Control Program. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 105(490), 493-505. DOI ↗
别名CIE, counterfactual evaluation, counterfactual policy evaluation, impact evaluationSCM, synthetic control, synth estimator, Abadie-Diamond-Hainmueller method
相关54
摘要Counterfactual Impact Evaluation is a family of causal methods that estimates the effect of an intervention by comparing what actually happened to participants with what would have happened had the intervention not taken place. Formalised in the Rubin Causal Model and extended by Heckman, Imbens and others, CIE underlies most modern program and policy evaluation practice.The Synthetic Control Method estimates the causal effect of a treatment or policy on a single treated unit by constructing a weighted combination of untreated units — the synthetic control — that closely resembles the treated unit before the intervention. The gap between the treated unit and its synthetic counterpart after the intervention is the estimated treatment effect.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Counterfactual Impact Evaluation · Synthetic Control Method. 于 2026-06-18 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare