方法对比
并排查看您选择的方法；存在差异的行会高亮显示。
| COPE 出版伦理指南× | 学术研究中的剽窃× | |
|---|---|---|
| 领域 | 出版伦理 | 出版伦理 |
| 方法族 | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| 起源年份≠ | 1997 | 1989 |
| 提出者≠ | Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) | U.S. Office of Research Integrity (ORI) and institutional policies |
| 类型 | Standard | Standard |
| 开创性文献≠ | Committee on Publication Ethics (2023). COPE Guidelines. COPE Website. link ↗ | U.S. Office of Research Integrity (2023). Definition of Research Misconduct. Federal Policy on Research Misconduct (42 CFR Part 93). ORI. link ↗ |
| 别名 | COPE, Publication Ethics Flowcharts, Editorial Guidelines | Text Plagiarism, Idea Plagiarism, Self-Plagiarism |
| 相关 | 4 | 4 |
| 摘要≠ | The Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE), founded in 1997, is an international organization of journal editors and publishers that promotes and advances research integrity and publication ethics. COPE provides practical guidance through flowcharts, position statements, and ethical guidelines addressing misconduct (fabrication, falsification, plagiarism), authorship disputes, conflicts of interest, and corrections. COPE's resources are freely available and adopted by thousands of journals globally. COPE is not a regulator; it advises editors and researchers on handling ethical issues and promotes a culture of integrity in publishing. | Plagiarism—the use of others' words, ideas, or methods without attribution—is formally classified as research misconduct by the U.S. Office of Research Integrity and most institutions worldwide. It ranges from verbatim copying of text to paraphrasing without citation to presenting others' ideas as one's own. Unlike accidental omission of a citation (which is corrected via erratum), plagiarism implies intent or gross negligence and triggers investigation, potential retraction, and career consequences. Plagiarism detection tools (e.g., Turnitin, iThenticate) and manual checking by journals now routinely screen manuscripts. |
| ScholarGate数据集 ↗ |
|
|