ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

Constructive Technology Assessment×Participatory Technology Assessment×
领域Science Technology StudiesScience Technology Studies
方法族Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
起源年份19951995
提出者Arie Rip & Johan Schot (Dutch CTA tradition)Danish Board of Technology tradition; Simon Joss, John Durant, Leonhard Hennen
类型Co-evolutionary technology-shaping processDeliberative public-participation process
开创性文献Schot, J., & Rip, A. (1997). The past and future of constructive technology assessment. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 54(2-3), 251-268. DOI ↗Joss, S., & Durant, J. (Eds.). (1995). Public Participation in Science: The Role of Consensus Conferences in Europe. Science Museum. ISBN: 9780901805874
别名CTA, Constructive TA, Co-evolutionary technology assessmentpTA, Public technology assessment, Citizen technology assessment
相关44
摘要Constructive Technology Assessment (CTA) is an approach to assessing technology that seeks to influence its design and development, not merely to forecast its impacts after the fact. By broadening the design process to feed societal aspects back to engineers and decision-makers early—while the technology is still malleable—CTA aims to manage the co-evolution of technology and society and to soften the Collingridge dilemma, the bind in which a technology's effects are easy to change before they are known and hard to change once they are.Participatory technology assessment (pTA) involves lay citizens and stakeholders—not only experts—in assessing the social, ethical, and political dimensions of technologies. Through structured deliberative formats such as consensus conferences, citizens' juries, and scenario workshops, ordinary people are informed, allowed to question experts, and helped to form and articulate a considered collective view, which is then fed into public and policy debate. pTA democratises technology assessment, treating the public not as a problem to be managed but as a legitimate voice in technological choices.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Constructive Technology Assessment · Participatory Technology Assessment. 于 2026-06-24 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare