ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

混淆矩阵×准确率×Matthews Correlation Coefficient×
领域模型评估模型评估模型评估
方法族MCDMMCDMMCDM
起源年份20th century20th century1975
提出者Statistical foundationsHistorical statistical foundationsBrian W. Matthews
类型Evaluation visualizationEvaluation metricEvaluation metric
开创性文献Everitt, B. S., & Hothorn, T. (2005). A Handbook of Statistical Analyses Using R. Chapman and Hall/CRC. link ↗Fawcett, T. (2006). An introduction to ROC analysis. Pattern Recognition Letters, 27(8), 861-874. DOI ↗Matthews, B. W. (1975). Comparison of predicted and observed secondary structure of T4 phage lysozyme. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA)-Protein Structure, 405(2), 442-451. DOI ↗
别名Error Matrix, Contingency TableOverall Accuracy, Correct Classification RatePhi Coefficient, Binary Classification Correlation
相关555
摘要The confusion matrix is a table that displays the counts of true positives, true negatives, false positives, and false negatives. It provides a complete picture of where a classifier makes correct and incorrect predictions, enabling calculation of all other classification metrics.Accuracy is the proportion of correct predictions among the total number of predictions made by a classification model. It is the most intuitive performance metric and measures how often the classifier makes correct predictions overall, regardless of class.The Matthews Correlation Coefficient (MCC) is a correlation measure between predicted and actual binary classifications. It ranges from -1 to 1 and is considered one of the most reliable single-score metrics for evaluating binary classifiers, especially on imbalanced datasets.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Confusion Matrix · Accuracy · Matthews Correlation Coefficient. 于 2026-06-18 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare