方法对比
并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。
| 计算机化自适应测验(CAT)中的区分效度× | 判别效度× | |
|---|---|---|
| 领域 | 心理测量学 | 心理测量学 |
| 方法族 | Latent structure | Latent structure |
| 起源年份≠ | 1959 (discriminant validity); CAT application from 1990s onward | 1959 |
| 提出者≠ | Campbell & Fiske (discriminant validity framework); applied to CAT by educational measurement researchers | Donald T. Campbell and Donald W. Fiske |
| 类型≠ | Validity evaluation technique | Validity evidence / psychometric evaluation |
| 开创性文献≠ | Weiss, D. J. (2004). Computerized adaptive testing for effective and efficient measurement in counseling and education. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 37(2), 70–84. DOI ↗ | Campbell, D. T., & Fiske, D. W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56(2), 81–105. DOI ↗ |
| 别名 | CAT discriminant validity, adaptive test divergent validity, CAT scale differentiation, CAT construct separation | discriminant validity evidence, divergent validity, DV, AVE-based discriminant validity |
| 相关 | 5 | 5 |
| 摘要≠ | Discriminant validity in computerized adaptive testing (CAT) is the evaluation process confirming that a CAT-administered scale measures its intended construct distinctly from related but conceptually different constructs. Despite the adaptive item-selection mechanism varying each respondent's item set, evidence must be provided that CAT-derived scores do not overlap excessively with scores from theoretically distinct scales. | Discriminant validity is evidence that a latent construct is empirically distinct from other constructs it should differ from. Originating in Campbell and Fiske's multitrait-multimethod framework (1959), it is a core component of construct validity and a mandatory check in scale development and structural equation modeling. |
| ScholarGate数据集 ↗ |
|
|