ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

计算机化自适应测验(CAT)中的区分效度×判别效度×
领域心理测量学心理测量学
方法族Latent structureLatent structure
起源年份1959 (discriminant validity); CAT application from 1990s onward1959
提出者Campbell & Fiske (discriminant validity framework); applied to CAT by educational measurement researchersDonald T. Campbell and Donald W. Fiske
类型Validity evaluation techniqueValidity evidence / psychometric evaluation
开创性文献Weiss, D. J. (2004). Computerized adaptive testing for effective and efficient measurement in counseling and education. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 37(2), 70–84. DOI ↗Campbell, D. T., & Fiske, D. W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56(2), 81–105. DOI ↗
别名CAT discriminant validity, adaptive test divergent validity, CAT scale differentiation, CAT construct separationdiscriminant validity evidence, divergent validity, DV, AVE-based discriminant validity
相关55
摘要Discriminant validity in computerized adaptive testing (CAT) is the evaluation process confirming that a CAT-administered scale measures its intended construct distinctly from related but conceptually different constructs. Despite the adaptive item-selection mechanism varying each respondent's item set, evidence must be provided that CAT-derived scores do not overlap excessively with scores from theoretically distinct scales.Discriminant validity is evidence that a latent construct is empirically distinct from other constructs it should differ from. Originating in Campbell and Fiske's multitrait-multimethod framework (1959), it is a core component of construct validity and a mandatory check in scale development and structural equation modeling.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Computerized adaptive test discriminant validity · Discriminant Validity. 于 2026-06-17 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare