ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

协整检验(Johansen / Engle-Granger)×ARDL 边界检验(Pesaran 边界检验)×格兰杰因果检验×
领域计量经济学计量经济学计量经济学
方法族Regression modelRegression modelRegression model
起源年份198820011969
提出者Engle & Granger (1987); Johansen (1988)Pesaran, Shin & SmithClive W. J. Granger
类型Time-series cointegration testCointegration test / Autoregressive distributed lag modelTime-series predictive causality test
开创性文献Johansen, S. (1988). Statistical Analysis of Cointegration Vectors. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 12(2-3), 231-254. DOI ↗Pesaran, M. H., Shin, Y., & Smith, R. J. (2001). Bounds Testing Approaches to the Analysis of Level Relationships. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 16(3), 289–326. DOI ↗Granger, C. W. J. (1969). Investigating Causal Relations by Econometric Models and Cross-spectral Methods. Econometrica, 37(3), 424-438. DOI ↗
别名Johansen cointegration test, Engle-Granger cointegration test, long-run equilibrium test, Eşbütünleşme Testi (Johansen/Engle-Granger)Pesaran bounds test, bounds testing approach, ARDL cointegration test, ARDL Sınır Testi (Pesaran Bounds Test)Granger causality test, Granger non-causality test, predictive causality test, Granger Nedensellik Testi
相关545
摘要The cointegration test examines whether non-stationary time series that each contain a unit root share a stable long-run equilibrium relationship. The single-equation residual approach was introduced by Engle and Granger (1987) and the system-based rank approach by Johansen (1988).The ARDL bounds test is an autoregressive distributed lag method that tests for a cointegrating (long-run level) relationship between time series, introduced by Pesaran, Shin and Smith in 2001. Unlike the Johansen procedure, it remains valid whether the variables are I(0), I(1) or a mix of the two, and it is more reliable than Johansen in small samples of roughly 30 to 80 observations.The Granger causality test, introduced by Clive W. J. Granger in 1969, assesses whether the past values of one time series help predict another beyond what the latter's own past already explains. It defines causality in a strictly predictive sense rather than as a structural or physical cause.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Cointegration Test · ARDL Bounds Test · Granger Causality. 于 2026-06-19 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare