ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

组合距离评估法×Analytic Network Process (ANP,具有反馈和相互依赖性的AHP)×
领域决策决策
方法族MCDMMCDM
起源年份20161996
提出者Keshavarz Ghorabaee, M., Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z., Antucheviciene, J.Saaty, T. L.
类型Distance from anti-ideal (Euclidean + Taxicab)Weight_Subjective (pairwise comparison, supermatrix, network structure)
开创性文献Keshavarz Ghorabaee, M., Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z., Antucheviciene, J. (2016). A new combinative distance-based assessment (CODAS) method for multi-criteria decision-making. Economic Computation and Economic Cybernetics Studies and Research link ↗Saaty, T. L. (1996). Decision Making with Dependence and Feedback: The Analytic Network Process. RWS Publications, Pittsburgh ISBN: 0-9620317-9-8
别名
相关88
摘要CODAS (Combinative Distance-Based Assessment) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Keshavarz Ghorabaee, M., Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z., Antucheviciene, J. in 2016. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.ANP (Analytic Network Process (AHP with feedback and interdependences)) is a weight subjective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Saaty, T. L. in 1996. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 1 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: CODAS · ANP. 于 2026-06-15 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare