ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

共被引分析×文献耦合分析×
领域文献计量学文献计量学
方法族Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
起源年份19731963
提出者Henry SmallMelvin M. Kessler
类型MethodMethod
开创性文献Small, H. (1973). Co-citation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between two documents. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 24(4), 265–269. DOI ↗Kessler, M. M. (1963). Bibliographic coupling between scientific papers. American Documentation, 14(3), 123–131. DOI ↗
别名co-citation mapping, historiograph, direct citation, citation pair analysisdocument coupling, bibliographic similarity
相关55
摘要Co-citation analysis is a method that identifies the intellectual structure of a research domain by examining how frequently pairs of documents are cited together in other publications. When two papers are frequently cited together in the literature, they are considered co-cited, indicating they are conceptually related or influential within the same research community. Developed by Henry Small in 1973, co-citation analysis maps the 'invisible colleges' of science—networks of researchers working on related problems—and reveals how knowledge domains evolve over time.Bibliographic coupling is a method that identifies intellectual relationships between documents by measuring their shared references. Two papers are considered 'coupled' when they cite the same sources, indicating they address related research questions or draw from the same conceptual foundations. Introduced by Kessler in 1963, this approach enables researchers to map knowledge domains and discover thematically similar publications without relying on subject cataloging or keywords.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Co-Citation Analysis · Bibliographic Coupling. 于 2026-06-18 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare