ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

簇抽样×多层模型×
领域调查方法论研究统计学
方法族Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
起源年份Early-to-mid 20th century; canonical treatment 1953/19771992
提出者Formalized by William G. Cochran; roots in early 20th-century U.S. Census Bureau survey practiceAnthony Bryk and Stephen Raudenbush
类型Probability sampling designMethod
开创性文献Cochran, W. G. (1977). Sampling Techniques (3rd ed.). Wiley. ISBN: 978-0471162407Bryk, A. S., & Raudenbush, S. W. (1992). Hierarchical Linear Models: Applications and Data Analysis Methods. SAGE Publications. DOI ↗
别名cluster random sampling, area sampling, one-stage cluster samplingHLM, mixed-effects models, random effects models, MLM
相关53
摘要Cluster sampling is a probability sampling technique in which the population is divided into naturally occurring groups (clusters), a random sample of clusters is selected, and all — or a random subset of — members within each selected cluster are studied. It is especially practical when a complete population list is unavailable or when units are geographically dispersed, making individual random selection prohibitively expensive. One-stage cluster sampling surveys every member of selected clusters; two-stage designs add a second random draw within clusters.Multilevel modeling (also called hierarchical linear modeling, mixed-effects modeling) is a statistical framework for analyzing data organized in nested or clustered structures—students within schools, patients within hospitals, repeated measures within individuals. Developed by Bryk and Raudenbush (1992), it accounts for dependency among observations and partitions variance into levels (within-cluster and between-cluster), enabling valid inference and revealing context effects. Essential in education, medicine, organizational research, and any field where data have natural hierarchies.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Cluster Sampling · Multilevel Modeling. 于 2026-06-19 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare