ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

簇随机 A/B 测试×现场实验×
领域实验设计实验设计
方法族Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
起源年份2010s (digital platforms); cluster RCT roots date to the 1970s–1980s1920s–1930s (agriculture); 1990s–2000s (social sciences)
提出者Developed from cluster randomized trial methodology; popularized in digital experimentation by researchers at Facebook, LinkedIn, and Microsoft Research (2010s)Formalized by R. A. Fisher (1935); systematized in social sciences by Harrison & List (2004)
类型Experimental designExperimental design
开创性文献Ugander, J., Karrer, B., Backstrom, L., & Kleinberg, J. (2013). Graph cluster randomization: Network exposure to multiple universes. Proceedings of the 19th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, 329–337. DOI ↗Harrison, G. W., & List, J. A. (2004). Field experiments. Journal of Economic Literature, 42(4), 1009–1055. DOI ↗
别名cluster A/B test, group-randomized A/B test, network A/B test, cluster-level split testfield trial, natural field experiment, randomized field experiment, field RCT
相关65
摘要A cluster randomized A/B test is an experimental design in which intact groups (clusters) — such as cities, schools, social network communities, or app user segments — are randomly assigned as whole units to either the treatment (A) or control (B) condition, rather than randomizing individual users or subjects. This approach is used when treatment effects would spill over between individuals if individual-level randomization were applied, or when the intervention must be delivered at the group level.A field experiment applies the logic of a randomized controlled trial in a naturally occurring, real-world environment rather than an artificial laboratory. Participants are randomly assigned to treatment and control conditions while going about everyday activities, allowing researchers to estimate causal effects with high internal validity while preserving a level of ecological realism that laboratory settings cannot offer. The design is especially prominent in economics, public health, political science, and development research.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Cluster Randomized A/B Test · Field Experiment. 于 2026-06-17 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare