方法对比

	临床学习环境量表加教师反馈分量表 (CLES+T)	学生临床实习满意度量表 (SCPS)
领域	健康教育	健康教育
方法族	Process / pipeline	Process / pipeline
起源年份	2007–2008	2007–2010
提出者	Marja Saarikoski, Hanne Leino-Kilpi, Tony Warne	Papastavrou et al.
类型	Self-report questionnaire	Self-report satisfaction questionnaire
开创性文献	Saarikoski, M., Isoaho, H., Warne, T., & Leino-Kilpi, H. (2008). The nurse teacher in clinical practice: Developing the new sub-dimension for the Clinical Learning Environment Supervision and Nurse Teacher (CLES+T) evaluation scale. Int J Nurs Stud 45(8): 1233–1237.	Papastavrou, E., Lambrinou, E., Tsangari, H., & Varthy, M. (2010). Students' satisfaction with their clinical learning environment in Cyprus: A longitudinal study. Nurs Educ Today 30(6): 539–544.
别名	CLES, CLES+T Scale, Clinical Learning Environment Supervision Scale	Clinical Placement Satisfaction, Placement Experience Scale, Clinical Site Satisfaction
相关	4	4
摘要	The CLES+T is a 34-item self-report questionnaire measuring nursing students' perceptions of their clinical learning environment and the quality of supervision received from their clinical preceptor or teacher. Originally developed by Saarikoski and colleagues in 2007 and expanded in 2008 to include a specific teacher feedback dimension, the CLES+T evaluates five key domains: Ward Learning Environment, Supervisory Relationship, Feedback and Evaluation, Nurse Teacher's Pedagogical Competence, and Empowerment. The scale is widely used in nursing education to assess the quality of clinical placements and identify areas for educational improvement.	The SCPS is a self-report questionnaire measuring students' overall satisfaction with their clinical placement experience, including satisfaction with the learning environment, educator support, clinical opportunities, and facility resources. Originally developed by Papastavrou and colleagues in Cyprus (2007–2010), the SCPS evaluates multiple aspects of placement quality that contribute to student wellbeing and learning outcomes. The scale is used to monitor placement satisfaction across programs, compare satisfaction across clinical sites, and identify areas for improvement in clinical education delivery.