ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

标准差法 (Criterion Impact LOSs objective weighting method)×AHPSort×加法比率评估×
领域决策决策决策
方法族MCDMMCDMMCDM
起源年份201620122010
提出者Zavadskas, E. K., Podvezko, V.Ishizaka, A., Nemery, P., Pearman, C.Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z.
类型Relative criterion-loss matrix weighting (Mirkin theorem based)AHP-based sorting with limiting or central profilesAdditive utility ratio (optimal reference row)
开创性文献Zavadskas, E. K., Podvezko, V. (2016). Integrated Determination of Objective Criteria Weights in MCDM. International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making DOI ↗Ishizaka, A., Nemery, P., Pearman, C. (2012). AHPSort: An AHP-based method for sorting problems. International Journal of Production Research DOI ↗Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z. (2010). A new additive ratio assessment (ARAS) method in multicriteria decision-making. Technological and Economic Development of Economy link ↗
别名
相关888
摘要CILOS (Criterion Impact LOSs objective weighting method) is a weight objective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Zavadskas, E. K., Podvezko, V. in 2016. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.AHPSORT (AHPSort — AHP-based classification of alternatives into ordered categories) is a sorting multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Ishizaka, A., Nemery, P., Pearman, C. in 2012. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.ARAS (Additive Ratio Assessment) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z. in 2010. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 1 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: CILOS · AHPSORT · ARAS. 于 2026-06-19 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare