ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

CHA₂DS₂-VASc 评分×Wells DVT评分×
领域临床评估临床评估
方法族Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
起源年份20101994
提出者Gregory Y. H. Lip, Robby Nieuwlaat, et al.Philip S. Wells
类型Atrial fibrillation stroke risk stratificationVenous thromboembolism risk stratification
开创性文献Lip, G. Y., Nieuwlaat, R., Pisters, R., Lane, D. A., & Crijns, H. J. (2010). Refining clinical risk stratification for predicting stroke and thromboembolism in atrial fibrillation using a novel risk factor-based approach: the euro heart survey on atrial fibrillation. Chest, 137(2), 263-272. DOI ↗Wells, P. S., Hirsh, J., Anderson, D. R., et al. (1994). A simple clinical model for the diagnosis of deep-vein thrombosis combined with impedance plethysmography. Archives of Internal Medicine, 154(13), 1541-1546. link ↗
别名CHA2DS2VASc, Atrial fibrillation stroke riskWells DVT Score, DVT Wells
相关33
摘要The CHA₂DS₂-VASc score, developed by Lip, Nieuwlaat, and colleagues in 2010, is a 9-point risk stratification tool for predicting annual stroke and systemic thromboembolism risk in patients with atrial fibrillation. It is the recommended score by major cardiology guidelines for guiding anticoagulation decisions.The Wells score, developed by Wells et al. in 1994, is a clinical prediction rule that stratifies patients into low, intermediate, or high pretest probability of deep vein thrombosis (DVT). It combines seven clinical features to guide diagnostic testing decisions and reduce unnecessary imaging in suspected DVT patients.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: CHA₂DS₂-VASc Score · Wells Score for DVT. 于 2026-06-19 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare