ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

标准差与相关系数客观赋权法×加法比率评估×
领域决策决策
方法族MCDMMCDM
起源年份20102010
提出者Wang, Y. M., Luo, Y.Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z.
类型Correlation-penalised standard-deviation weightingAdditive utility ratio (optimal reference row)
开创性文献Wang, Y. M., Luo, Y. (2010). Integration of correlations with standard deviations for determining attribute weights in multiple attribute decision making. Mathematical and Computer Modelling DOI ↗Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z. (2010). A new additive ratio assessment (ARAS) method in multicriteria decision-making. Technological and Economic Development of Economy link ↗
别名
相关88
摘要CCSD (Criteria Correlation and Standard Deviation objective weighting) is a weight objective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Wang, Y. M., Luo, Y. in 2010. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.ARAS (Additive Ratio Assessment) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z. in 2010. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 1 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: CCSD · ARAS. 于 2026-06-17 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare