ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

捕获-再捕获种群估计×基于被访者抽样×
领域调查方法论调查方法论
方法族Regression modelProcess / pipeline
起源年份19781997
提出者Otis, Burnham, White & AndersonDouglas Heckathorn
类型Probabilistic population size estimatorProbabilistic chain-referral sampling design
开创性文献Otis, D. L., Burnham, K. P., White, G. C., & Anderson, D. R. (1978). Statistical inference from capture data on closed animal populations. Wildlife Monographs, 62, 3–135. link ↗Heckathorn, D. D. (1997). Respondent-driven sampling: A new approach to the study of hidden populations. Social Problems, 44(2), 174–199. DOI ↗
别名Mark-Recapture, Tag-Recapture, Mark-Release-Recapture, İşaretle-Yeniden YakalaChain-Referral Sampling, Peer-Referral Sampling, Network-Based Sampling, Katılımcı Güdümlü Örnekleme
相关23
摘要Capture-recapture (also known as mark-recapture) is a statistical method for estimating the size of an unknown population by sampling it twice and tracking which individuals appear in both samples. Formally systematized for closed animal populations by Otis, Burnham, White, and Anderson in their landmark 1978 Wildlife Monographs paper, the method extends naturally to human populations, epidemiology, and incomplete administrative records.Respondent-Driven Sampling (RDS) is a probabilistic chain-referral method designed to reach hidden or hard-to-reach populations that lack a sampling frame. Introduced by sociologist Douglas Heckathorn in 1997, RDS combines snowball recruitment with mathematical weighting based on participants' personal network sizes, allowing researchers to generate population-level estimates even when no complete membership list exists.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 1 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Capture-Recapture · Respondent-Driven Sampling. 于 2026-06-18 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare