ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

最佳-最差法 (Best-Worst Method)×加法比率评估×AROMAN(考虑双步归一化的排序顺序方法)×
领域决策决策决策
方法族MCDMMCDMMCDM
起源年份201520102022
提出者Rezaei, J.Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z.Zdravković, M., Hamid, M., Radovanović, M.
类型Pairwise comparison (best-to-others + others-to-worst vectors), LPAdditive utility ratio (optimal reference row)Two-step normalisation (linear + vector) with weighted power aggregation
开创性文献Rezaei, J. (2015). Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method. Omega DOI ↗Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z. (2010). A new additive ratio assessment (ARAS) method in multicriteria decision-making. Technological and Economic Development of Economy link ↗Zdravković, M., Hamid, M., Radovanović, M. (2022). AROMAN — Alternative Ranking Order Method Accounting for Two-Step Normalisation. Journal of Computational Design and Engineering link ↗
别名
相关888
摘要BWM (Best-Worst Method) is a weight subjective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Rezaei, J. in 2015. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.ARAS (Additive Ratio Assessment) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z. in 2010. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.AROMAN (Alternative Ranking Order Method Accounting for Two-Step Normalisation) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Zdravković, M., Hamid, M., Radovanović, M. in 2022. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 1 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: BWM · ARAS · AROMAN. 于 2026-06-19 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare