ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

基于文献计量学的叙事性综述×共被引分析×
领域科学计量学文献计量学
方法族Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
起源年份2017 (bibliometrix package); narrative review methodology is older1973
提出者Aria & Cuccurullo (bibliometrix R package); narrative review as a traditional form predates this toolHenry Small
类型Mixed quantitative-qualitative review methodologyMethod
开创性文献Aria, M., & Cuccurullo, C. (2017). bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 11(4), 959–975. DOI ↗Small, H. (1973). Co-citation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between two documents. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 24(4), 265–269. DOI ↗
别名bibliometrix narrative review, R-bibliometrix narrative synthesis, quantitative-assisted narrative reviewco-citation mapping, historiograph, direct citation, citation pair analysis
相关65
摘要A bibliometrix-assisted narrative review combines the quantitative field-mapping capabilities of the bibliometrix R package with the interpretive flexibility of a traditional narrative review. Bibliometric indicators — publication trends, author and country productivity, co-citation networks, keyword co-occurrence — are computed and visualised first to orient the reviewer, then a discursive, thematic narrative synthesises the intellectual content of key sources. The result is a structured yet flexible overview of a field that is more transparent and reproducible than a purely informal narrative.Co-citation analysis is a method that identifies the intellectual structure of a research domain by examining how frequently pairs of documents are cited together in other publications. When two papers are frequently cited together in the literature, they are considered co-cited, indicating they are conceptually related or influential within the same research community. Developed by Henry Small in 1973, co-citation analysis maps the 'invisible colleges' of science—networks of researchers working on related problems—and reveals how knowledge domains evolve over time.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: bibliometrix-assisted narrative review · Co-Citation Analysis. 于 2026-06-19 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare