方法对比
并排查看您选择的方法；存在差异的行会高亮显示。
| bibliometrix-assisted Bibliometric Analysis× | 共被引分析× | |
|---|---|---|
| 领域≠ | 科学计量学 | 文献计量学 |
| 方法族 | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| 起源年份≠ | 2017 | 1973 |
| 提出者≠ | Massimo Aria and Corrado Cuccurullo (bibliometrix R package) | Henry Small |
| 类型≠ | Quantitative review method with software toolkit | Method |
| 开创性文献≠ | Aria, M., & Cuccurullo, C. (2017). bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 11(4), 959–975. DOI ↗ | Small, H. (1973). Co-citation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between two documents. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 24(4), 265–269. DOI ↗ |
| 别名 | bibliometrix bibliometric analysis, R-based bibliometric analysis, bibliometrix workflow, bibliometrix package analysis | co-citation mapping, historiograph, direct citation, citation pair analysis |
| 相关≠ | 6 | 5 |
| 摘要≠ | bibliometrix-assisted bibliometric analysis is a structured quantitative approach to mapping a scientific field using the bibliometrix R package. Developed by Aria and Cuccurullo (2017), it provides an integrated environment for importing bibliographic records from Scopus or Web of Science, computing performance indicators, building co-authorship and citation networks, and generating thematic maps — all within a reproducible R or Shiny workflow. | Co-citation analysis is a method that identifies the intellectual structure of a research domain by examining how frequently pairs of documents are cited together in other publications. When two papers are frequently cited together in the literature, they are considered co-cited, indicating they are conceptually related or influential within the same research community. Developed by Henry Small in 1973, co-citation analysis maps the 'invisible colleges' of science—networks of researchers working on related problems—and reveals how knowledge domains evolve over time. |
| ScholarGate数据集 ↗ |
|
|