方法对比
并排查看您选择的方法；存在差异的行会高亮显示。
| “贝尔蒙特报告” (Belmont Report)× | 机构审查委员会× | |
|---|---|---|
| 领域 | 研究伦理 | 研究伦理 |
| 方法族 | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| 起源年份≠ | 1979 | 1974 |
| 提出者≠ | National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research (US DHEW) | U.S. Federal Requirement (National Research Act 1974); International adoption by WMA and research institutions globally |
| 类型≠ | Framework | Standard |
| 开创性文献≠ | National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research. (1979). The Belmont Report: Ethical Principles and Guidelines for the Protection of Human Subjects of Research. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare. link ↗ | U.S. Code of Federal Regulations, Title 45, Part 46: Protection of Human Subjects. Office of the Federal Register. link ↗ |
| 别名≠ | Belmont Principles, Three Ethical Principles | IRB, Research Ethics Committee, REC |
| 相关≠ | 5 | 4 |
| 摘要≠ | The Belmont Report (1979) is the foundational US ethical framework for human subjects research, established by the National Commission following the Tuskegee Syphilis Study scandal. It articulates three core principles—Respect for Persons, Beneficence, and Justice—that form the basis for institutional review and regulatory oversight of human research globally. Every researcher conducting human studies must understand and apply these principles. | The Institutional Review Board (IRB) is the independent ethics committee established at research institutions to review and approve human subjects research, ensuring compliance with ethical principles and federal regulations. Created as a legal requirement by the U.S. National Research Act (1974) and now adopted globally, the IRB serves as the primary mechanism for protecting research subjects while enabling legitimate research to proceed. No human subjects research can begin without IRB approval. |
| ScholarGate数据集 ↗ |
|
|