ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

贝叶斯全基因组表观遗传关联研究 (Bayesian EWAS)×贝叶斯全基因组关联研究 (Bayesian GWAS)×
领域生物信息学生物信息学
方法族Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
起源年份2010s (framework developed ~2013–2016)2007–2009 (formal statistical framework)
提出者Multiple groups; Bayesian EWAS framework advanced by S. Richardson, P.-C. Tsai, J. T. Bell and colleaguesMatthew Stephens, David J. Balding, Jon Wakefield (key formalizers ca. 2007–2009)
类型Statistical association analysisStatistical genetic association analysis
开创性文献Richardson, S., Tsai, P. C., Bell, J. T., & Timpson, N. J. (2016). Bayesian approaches to studying associations between epigenetic marks and phenotypes. International Journal of Epidemiology, 45(3), 694–705. link ↗Stephens, M., & Balding, D. J. (2009). Bayesian statistical methods for genetic association studies. Nature Reviews Genetics, 10(10), 681–690. DOI ↗
别名Bayesian EWAS, B-EWAS, Bayesian methylation-wide association study, Bayesian epigenetic association analysisBayesian GWAS, Bayesian genome-wide association analysis, Bayesian GWA study, BF-GWAS
相关45
摘要A Bayesian EWAS is a genome-scale association analysis that links epigenetic marks — most commonly CpG-site DNA methylation — to a phenotype or trait of interest, replacing or supplementing the classical frequentist p-value framework with a Bayesian probabilistic model. It yields posterior probabilities of association and credible intervals for each CpG site, allowing formal incorporation of prior biological knowledge and more principled handling of the multiple-testing burden intrinsic to testing hundreds of thousands of sites simultaneously.Bayesian GWAS applies Bayesian statistical inference to genome-wide association studies, replacing classical p-value thresholds with Bayes factors and posterior probabilities. This framework naturally incorporates prior knowledge about effect sizes and variant frequencies, quantifies evidence for association on a continuous scale, and supports principled fine-mapping of causal variants within associated loci. It is widely used in complex trait genetics, population genomics, and translational research where uncertainty quantification and multi-variant modeling matter.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Bayesian epigenome-wide association study · Bayesian GWAS. 于 2026-06-18 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare