ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

贝叶斯增广迪基-富勒单位根检验×Phillips-Perron单位根检验×
领域计量经济学计量经济学
方法族Regression modelRegression model
起源年份1991–19921988
提出者Sims & Uhlig (1991); Koop, Osiewalski & Steel (1992)Peter C. B. Phillips and Pierre Perron
类型Bayesian hypothesis testHypothesis test (unit root)
开创性文献Sims, C. A., & Uhlig, H. (1991). Understanding unit rooters: A helicopter tour. Econometrica, 59(6), 1591–1599. DOI ↗Phillips, P. C. B., & Perron, P. (1988). Testing for a unit root in time series regression. Biometrika, 75(2), 335–346. DOI ↗
别名Bayesian ADF test, Bayesian unit root test, Bayesian Dickey-Fuller, BADFPP test, PP unit root test, Phillips-Perron test, nonparametric unit root test
相关65
摘要The Bayesian Augmented Dickey-Fuller (BADF) unit root test re-frames the classical ADF test within a Bayesian framework. Rather than computing a frequentist p-value, it quantifies evidence for or against a unit root by comparing posterior probabilities or Bayes factors under the null (unit root) and alternative (stationarity) hypotheses, incorporating prior beliefs about the autoregressive parameter.The Phillips-Perron (PP) test is a nonparametric unit root test for time series that corrects for serial correlation and heteroscedasticity in the error term without adding lagged differences. Introduced by Phillips and Perron (1988), it applies a kernel-based long-run variance estimator to adjust the Dickey-Fuller statistic, making it robust to a wide class of weakly dependent error processes.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Bayesian ADF unit root test · Phillips-Perron unit root test. 于 2026-06-17 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare