ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

平衡准确率×混淆矩阵×精确率×
领域模型评估模型评估模型评估
方法族MCDMMCDMMCDM
起源年份201020th century20th century
提出者Brodersen, Ong, Stephan, and BuhmannStatistical foundationsHistorical statistical foundations
类型Evaluation metricEvaluation visualizationEvaluation metric
开创性文献Brodersen, K. H., Ong, C. S., Stephan, K. E., & Buhmann, J. M. (2010). The balanced accuracy and its posterior distribution. 20th International Conference on Pattern Recognition (ICPR), 3121-3124. DOI ↗Everitt, B. S., & Hothorn, T. (2005). A Handbook of Statistical Analyses Using R. Chapman and Hall/CRC. link ↗Fawcett, T. (2006). An introduction to ROC analysis. Pattern Recognition Letters, 27(8), 861-874. DOI ↗
别名Average Recall, Equal-weight Average SensitivityError Matrix, Contingency TablePositive Predictive Value, PPV
相关555
摘要Balanced accuracy is the average of recall values computed for each class separately. It corrects for class imbalance by giving equal weight to the performance on each class, regardless of class frequency in the dataset.The confusion matrix is a table that displays the counts of true positives, true negatives, false positives, and false negatives. It provides a complete picture of where a classifier makes correct and incorrect predictions, enabling calculation of all other classification metrics.Precision measures the proportion of positive predictions that were actually correct. It answers the question: 'Of all the cases we predicted as positive, how many were truly positive?' Precision is critical in scenarios where false positives are costly.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Balanced Accuracy · Confusion Matrix · Precision. 于 2026-06-19 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare