ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

自适应分层抽样×配额抽样×
领域调查方法论调查方法论
方法族Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
起源年份1990s (formal development from Thompson 1990 onward)1930s
提出者Steven K. Thompson (adaptive sampling); allocation adaptations by Salehi, Seber, and othersDeveloped in market research and opinion polling, notably applied by George Gallup in the 1930s
类型Probability-based adaptive sampling designNon-probability sampling design
开创性文献Thompson, S. K. (1990). Adaptive cluster sampling. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 85(412), 1050–1059. DOI ↗Moser, C. A., & Kalton, G. (1972). Survey Methods in Social Investigation (2nd ed.). Heinemann. ISBN: 978-0435827496
别名ASS, adaptive stratified design, stratified adaptive sampling, adaptive allocation stratified samplingquota-controlled sampling, quota selection, non-probability quota sampling
相关65
摘要Adaptive stratified sampling divides the population into strata and then applies an adaptive rule within each stratum: whenever an initially selected unit satisfies a pre-specified condition (e.g., a rare species is found, a variable exceeds a threshold), neighboring or related units are added to the sample. This combines the variance-reduction power of stratification with the ability to concentrate sampling effort where the phenomenon of interest is actually present.Quota sampling is a non-probability technique in which the researcher pre-specifies how many units to recruit from each subgroup (quota cell) defined by one or more control variables such as age, gender, or occupation. Interviewers or data collectors then use their own judgment to find and enroll participants until each cell is filled. The method guarantees the sample mirrors the population on the control variables but does not provide the randomness needed for classical statistical inference.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Adaptive Stratified Sampling · Quota Sampling. 于 2026-06-18 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare