ScholarGate
助手
Process / pipelineh-index variants / author metrics

hg-Index (Composite Hirsch-Egghe)

The hg-index, proposed by Alonso, Cabrerizo, Herrera-Viedma, and Herrera in 2010, fuses the two best-known author metrics into a single composite. The h-index is robust but ignores how heavily an author's top papers are cited, while Egghe's g-index rewards those highly cited papers but can be swayed by a single outlier. The hg-index takes the geometric mean of the two, producing a value that lies between them and inherits a balance of their strengths: it remains close to the stable h-index while still responding to the citation impact captured by g. The authors showed that the geometric mean stays nearer to the smaller, more conservative h-index than the larger g-index, tempering the latter's sensitivity to extreme papers.

用 Lacuna 应用即将推出应用、比较、获取指导
工具与资源
下载幻灯片
学习与探索
视频即将推出

阅读完整方法

仅限会员

使用免费账户登录即可阅读本节。

登录

方法图谱

相关方法的邻域——选择一个节点以展开探索。

来源

  1. Alonso, S., Cabrerizo, F. J., Herrera-Viedma, E., & Herrera, F. (2010). hg-index: a new index to characterize the scientific output of researchers based on the h- and g-indices. Scientometrics, 82(2), 391-400. DOI: 10.1007/s11192-009-0047-5
  2. Egghe, L. (2006). Theory and practise of the g-index. Scientometrics, 69(1), 131-152. DOI: 10.1007/s11192-006-0144-7
  3. Hirsch, J. E. (2005). An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 102(46), 16569-16572. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0507655102

如何引用本页

ScholarGate. (2026, June 23). hg-Index (Alonso Geometric Mean of h and g). ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/zh/bibliometrics/hg-index

选用哪种方法?

将本方法与其最相近的同类并置,并排研读——本馆将书籍铺陈于案上,取舍则由您定夺。

并排比较

被引用于

ScholarGatehg-Index (Composite Hirsch-Egghe) (hg-Index (Alonso Geometric Mean of h and g)). 于 2026-06-24 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/bibliometrics/hg-index · 数据集: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20539026