So sánh phương pháp
Xem các phương pháp đã chọn cạnh nhau; những hàng khác biệt được làm nổi bật.
| Phân tích cỡ mẫu mạnh mẽ× | Phân tích cỡ hiệu ứng× | |
|---|---|---|
| Lĩnh vực | Thống kê | Thống kê |
| Họ | Hypothesis test | Hypothesis test |
| Năm ra đời≠ | 2005 (formalized) | 1969 (first edition); 1988 (definitive second edition) |
| Người khởi xướng≠ | Algina, Keselman & Penfield; Wilcox | Jacob Cohen |
| Loại≠ | Robust effect size estimation | Standardized magnitude estimation |
| Công trình gốc≠ | Algina, J., Keselman, H. J., & Penfield, R. D. (2005). An alternative to Cohen's standardized mean difference effect size: A robust parameter and confidence interval in the two independent groups case. Psychological Methods, 10(3), 317–328. DOI ↗ | Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. ISBN: 978-0805802832 |
| Tên gọi khác | robust Cohen's d, trimmed-mean effect size, outlier-resistant effect size, robust standardized mean difference | effect magnitude estimation, standardized effect measure, practical significance analysis, ES analysis |
| Liên quan≠ | 5 | 4 |
| Tóm tắt≠ | Robust effect size analysis quantifies the magnitude of a difference or association using estimators that are resistant to outliers and violations of normality. Rather than relying on classical statistics such as Cohen's d based on sample means and standard deviations, robust variants use trimmed means and Winsorized standard deviations to produce effect size estimates that accurately reflect the typical effect rather than being inflated by extreme values. | Effect size analysis quantifies the practical magnitude of a statistical result independently of sample size. Rather than asking only whether a difference or relationship is statistically significant, it asks how large it is, using standardized indices such as Cohen's d, eta-squared, omega-squared, or Pearson's r that allow direct comparison across studies and populations. |
| ScholarGateBộ dữ liệu ↗ |
|
|