ScholarGate
Trợ lý

So sánh phương pháp

Xem các phương pháp đã chọn cạnh nhau; những hàng khác biệt được làm nổi bật.

Thang đo Sẵn sàng cho Học tập Liên chuyên ngành (RIPLS)×Thang đo Nhận dạng Nghề nghiệp (PIS)×
Lĩnh vựcGiáo dục sức khỏeGiáo dục sức khỏe
HọProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Năm ra đời19992006
Người khởi xướngGail Parsell & John BlighAdams et al.
LoạiSelf-report questionnaireSelf-report questionnaire
Công trình gốcParsell, G. & Bligh, J. (1999). The development of a questionnaire to assess the readiness of health care students for interprofessional learning (RIPLS). Med Educ 33(2): 95–100. DOI ↗Adams, K., Hean, S., Sturgis, P., & Clark, J. M. (2006). Investigating the factors influencing professional identity of first-year health and social care students. Learn Health Soc Care 5(2): 55–68. DOI ↗
Tên gọi khácReadiness for IPL, RIPLS ScaleHealthcare Professional Identity, Disciplinary Identity Assessment
Liên quan44
Tóm tắtThe RIPLS is a 19-item self-report questionnaire designed to measure healthcare students' attitudes and readiness toward interprofessional learning and collaboration. Developed by Parsell and Bligh in 1999, it assesses three core dimensions of interprofessional readiness: teamwork and collaboration, professional identity, and recognition of roles and responsibilities across professions. The RIPLS is widely used in health professions education to evaluate the effectiveness of interprofessional education initiatives.The PIS is a self-report questionnaire measuring healthcare students' sense of professional identity, belonging, and commitment to their chosen discipline. Developed by Adams and colleagues in 2006, the PIS assesses the degree to which students have internalized professional roles, values, behaviors, and career commitment. The scale measures both cognitive elements (knowledge of professional standards and scope of practice) and emotional elements (sense of belonging, pride in discipline). The PIS is used in healthcare education to track professional identity development over training, identify students at risk of attrition, and evaluate the impact of socialization experiences on disciplinary commitment.
ScholarGateBộ dữ liệu
  1. v1
  2. 1 Nguồn tài liệu
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Nguồn tài liệu
  3. PUBLISHED

Đến trang tìm kiếm Tải xuống bản trình chiếu

ScholarGateSo sánh phương pháp: RIPLS · PIS. Truy cập ngày 2026-06-18 từ https://scholargate.app/vi/compare