ScholarGate
Trợ lý

So sánh phương pháp

Xem các phương pháp đã chọn cạnh nhau; những hàng khác biệt được làm nổi bật.

Đối chiếu điểm xu hướng để đánh giá chính sách×Trọng số điểm xu hướng (PSW / IPW)×
Lĩnh vựcSuy luận nhân quảSuy luận nhân quả
HọRegression modelRegression model
Năm ra đời1983; policy evaluation adaptation 19971983 (propensity score); 2003 (efficient IPW estimator)
Người khởi xướngRosenbaum & Rubin (1983); Heckman, Ichimura & Todd (1997) for program/policy evaluation applicationRosenbaum & Rubin (propensity score); Hirano, Imbens & Ridder (efficient weighting)
LoạiQuasi-experimental matching estimatorCausal inference / reweighting
Công trình gốcRosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70(1), 41-55. DOI ↗Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70(1), 41-55. DOI ↗
Tên gọi khácPSM policy evaluation, policy PSM, propensity matching for program evaluation, PSM treatment evaluationPSW, inverse probability weighting, IPW, propensity-based weighting
Liên quan66
Tóm tắtPolicy evaluation propensity score matching applies the propensity score framework — originally developed by Rosenbaum and Rubin (1983) and operationalized for program evaluation by Heckman et al. (1997) — to estimate the causal effect of a policy intervention. It constructs a credible comparison group from non-participants by matching them to participants on their estimated probability of receiving the treatment, enabling unbiased effect estimation without random assignment.Propensity score weighting is a causal-inference method that reweights observations so that the covariate distributions of treated and untreated units look exchangeable, enabling unbiased estimation of average treatment effects from observational data. Each unit receives a weight that is the inverse of its probability of receiving the treatment it actually received — a strategy formalised by Rosenbaum and Rubin (1983) and given its efficient semiparametric form by Hirano, Imbens and Ridder (2003).
ScholarGateBộ dữ liệu
  1. v1
  2. 2 Nguồn tài liệu
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Nguồn tài liệu
  3. PUBLISHED

Đến trang tìm kiếm Tải xuống bản trình chiếu

ScholarGateSo sánh phương pháp: Policy Evaluation Propensity Score Matching · Propensity Score Weighting. Truy cập ngày 2026-06-19 từ https://scholargate.app/vi/compare