So sánh phương pháp
Xem các phương pháp đã chọn cạnh nhau; những hàng khác biệt được làm nổi bật.
| Phân tích gộp× | Thiên lệch xuất bản× | |
|---|---|---|
| Lĩnh vực≠ | Viết học thuật | Thống kê nghiên cứu |
| Họ | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Năm ra đời≠ | 1976 | 1979 |
| Người khởi xướng≠ | Glass (1976, term coining); Fisher and Pearson (statistical foundations) | Robert Rosenthal |
| Loại≠ | Document Type | Concept |
| Công trình gốc≠ | Page, M. J., et al. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, n71. DOI ↗ | Rosenthal, R. (1979). The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results. Psychological Bulletin, 86(3), 638–641. DOI ↗ |
| Tên gọi khác | quantitative synthesis, meta-synthesis, pooled analysis, statistical integration | file drawer problem, selective reporting, outcome reporting bias, funnel plot asymmetry |
| Liên quan≠ | 2 | 4 |
| Tóm tắt≠ | Meta-analysis is the statistical pooling of quantitative findings from multiple independent studies to produce a combined effect estimate. By aggregating data across studies, meta-analysis increases statistical power, reduces random error, and provides a precise summary of an intervention's effectiveness or an association's magnitude. Gene V. Glass coined the term in 1976, formalizing a technique that has become indispensable for evidence synthesis in medicine, psychology, education, and other evidence-based disciplines. | Publication bias occurs when the results of a study influence whether the study is published. Typically, studies with statistically significant or positive results are more likely to be published than studies with non-significant or negative results, even if both are scientifically valid. This bias distorts the published literature, making treatments appear more effective than they actually are. Rosenthal (1979) termed this the 'file drawer problem': research with null results sits in file drawers, unpublished, creating a biased sample of published evidence. Funnel plots and statistical tests (e.g., Egger test) can detect asymmetry suggesting publication bias; meta-analyses must account for this bias. |
| ScholarGateBộ dữ liệu ↗ |
|
|