So sánh phương pháp
Xem các phương pháp đã chọn cạnh nhau; những hàng khác biệt được làm nổi bật.
| F1-score trung bình vĩ mô× | F1-score trung bình vi mô× | |
|---|---|---|
| Lĩnh vực | Đánh giá mô hình | Đánh giá mô hình |
| Họ | MCDM | MCDM |
| Năm ra đời | 2000s | 2000s |
| Người khởi xướng | Multi-class evaluation community | Multi-class evaluation community |
| Loại | Evaluation metric | Evaluation metric |
| Công trình gốc | Powers, D. M. (2011). Evaluation: From Precision, Recall and F-Measure to ROC, Informedness, Markedness and Correlation. Journal of Machine Learning Technologies, 2(1), 37-63. link ↗ | Powers, D. M. (2011). Evaluation: From Precision, Recall and F-Measure to ROC, Informedness, Markedness and Correlation. Journal of Machine Learning Technologies, 2(1), 37-63. link ↗ |
| Tên gọi khác | Macro F1, Unweighted average F1 | Micro F1, Frequency-weighted average F1 |
| Liên quan≠ | 3 | 4 |
| Tóm tắt≠ | Macro-averaged F1 computes the F1-score independently for each class and then takes the unweighted arithmetic mean. It treats all classes equally, regardless of their frequency in the dataset, making it useful for imbalanced multi-class problems. | Micro-averaged F1 computes the F1-score by aggregating true positives, false positives, and false negatives across all classes, then calculating a single metric. It is equivalent to accuracy in multi-class classification and is useful when class distributions reflect their natural importance. |
| ScholarGateBộ dữ liệu ↗ |
|
|