So sánh phương pháp
Xem các phương pháp đã chọn cạnh nhau; những hàng khác biệt được làm nổi bật.
| Thang đo Năng lực Động× | Thang đo Năng lực Hấp thụ× | |
|---|---|---|
| Lĩnh vực | Quản trị chiến lược | Quản trị chiến lược |
| Họ | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Năm ra đời≠ | 2007 | 2002 |
| Người khởi xướng≠ | David J. Teece | Shaker Zahra and Gerard George |
| Loại | Organizational self-report questionnaire | Organizational self-report questionnaire |
| Công trình gốc≠ | Teece, D. J. (2007). Explicating dynamic capabilities: The nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal, 28(13), 1319–1350. DOI ↗ | Zahra, S. A., & George, G. (2002). Absorptive capacity: A review, reconceptualization, and extension. Academy of Management Review, 27(2), 185–203. DOI ↗ |
| Tên gọi khác | DCV, Teece Dynamic Capabilities | ACAP, Zahra-George Scale |
| Liên quan | 5 | 5 |
| Tóm tắt≠ | Dynamic Capabilities (DC) represent an organization's capacity to sense new opportunities and threats, seize those opportunities through strategic investments and organizational changes, and reconfigure assets and organizational structures to adapt to shifting competitive environments. Teece (2007) articulated this framework in the Strategic Management Journal, arguing that dynamic capabilities—not static resources—explain sustained competitive advantage in turbulent, knowledge-intensive markets. This scale operationalizes the three core processes underlying DC: sensing market and technology changes, making swift strategic decisions, and reorganizing the firm to exploit new opportunities. | Absorptive Capacity (ACAP) refers to an organization's ability to acquire, assimilate, transform, and exploit external knowledge to enhance innovation and performance. Zahra and George (2002) reconceptualized absorptive capacity into four distinct but interrelated processes in their foundational Academy of Management Review article. This measurement scale captures organizational learning dynamics and knowledge-based competitive advantage, making it essential for assessing innovation capability and knowledge management effectiveness. |
| ScholarGateBộ dữ liệu ↗ |
|
|