ScholarGate
Trợ lý

So sánh phương pháp

Xem các phương pháp đã chọn cạnh nhau; những hàng khác biệt được làm nổi bật.

Nghiên cứu So sánh-Nguyên nhân Mặt cắt Ngang×Nghiên cứu nhân quả-so sánh×
Lĩnh vựcThiết kế nghiên cứuThiết kế nghiên cứu
HọProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Năm ra đời1960s onward1964
Người khởi xướngDonald T. Campbell and Julian C. Stanley (quasi-experimental foundations); refined in education research by various methodologistsFred N. Kerlinger
LoạiNon-experimental quantitative designNon-experimental quantitative research design
Công trình gốcFrankfort-Nachmias, C., & Nachmias, D. (2015). Research Methods in the Social Sciences (8th ed.). Worth Publishers. ISBN: 978-1429295154Kerlinger, F. N. (1964). Foundations of Behavioral Research. Holt, Rinehart and Winston. link ↗
Tên gọi kháccross-sectional ex post facto design, single-wave causal-comparative study, cross-sectional group-comparison design, cross-sectional criterion-group studyex post facto research, causal-comparative design, retrospective causal study, CCR
Liên quan33
Tóm tắtCross-sectional causal-comparative research compares two or more pre-existing groups — defined by a characteristic or experience that has already occurred — on one or more outcome variables, with all data collected at a single point in time. Because the presumed cause (group membership) precedes measurement but cannot be manipulated, the design sits between purely descriptive and truly experimental work. It is widely used in education, psychology, and social sciences when randomization is impossible or unethical.Causal-comparative research is a non-experimental quantitative design in which the researcher compares two or more groups that already differ on an independent variable — one that was not manipulated — to investigate possible causes or consequences of that difference. Because group membership is pre-existing rather than randomly assigned, the design can suggest causal relationships but cannot establish them with the certainty of a true experiment. It is widely used in education, psychology, and social sciences when experimental manipulation is impractical or unethical.
ScholarGateBộ dữ liệu
  1. v1
  2. 2 Nguồn tài liệu
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Nguồn tài liệu
  3. PUBLISHED

Đến trang tìm kiếm Tải xuống bản trình chiếu

ScholarGateSo sánh phương pháp: Cross-sectional causal-comparative research · Causal-Comparative Research. Truy cập ngày 2026-06-19 từ https://scholargate.app/vi/compare