So sánh phương pháp
Xem các phương pháp đã chọn cạnh nhau; những hàng khác biệt được làm nổi bật.
| Thang đo Năng lực Tự chủ Học thuật× | Thang đo Khuynh hướng Tư duy Phản biện× | |
|---|---|---|
| Lĩnh vực | Tâm lý học giáo dục | Tâm lý học giáo dục |
| Họ | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Năm ra đời≠ | 1977 | 1992 |
| Người khởi xướng≠ | Albert Bandura | Peter Facione |
| Loại≠ | Self-efficacy belief measurement | Critical thinking propensity measurement |
| Công trình gốc≠ | Bandura, A. (1977). Self-Efficacy: Toward a Unifying Theory of Behavioral Change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191-215. DOI ↗ | Facione, P. A., Facione, N. C., & Giancarlo, C. A. F. (1992). The California Critical Thinking Disposition Inventory. Insight Assessment, Millbrae, CA. link ↗ |
| Tên gọi khác≠ | ASES, Self-Efficacy for Academic Performance | CTDS, California Critical Thinking Disposition Inventory, CCTDI |
| Liên quan | 4 | 4 |
| Tóm tắt≠ | The Academic Self-Efficacy Scale (ASES) measures students' beliefs about their capability to succeed in academic tasks. Grounded in Bandura's social cognitive theory, the instrument assesses perceived competence in diverse academic domains—understanding lectures, completing assignments, performing on exams, and engaging in scholarly work. High academic self-efficacy is a strong predictor of achievement, persistence, and resilience in the face of academic challenges. | The Critical Thinking Dispositions Scale (CTDS), exemplified by the California Critical Thinking Disposition Inventory (CCTDI), measures the extent to which individuals exhibit cognitive dispositions conducive to critical thinking. Developed by Facione (1992), it assesses dimensions including truth-seeking, open-mindedness, analytical orientation, self-confidence, systematic approach, and inquisitiveness. Critical thinking dispositions—the habits of mind and values that support rigorous reasoning—are distinct from but complementary to critical thinking skills. |
| ScholarGateBộ dữ liệu ↗ |
|
|