So sánh phương pháp
Xem các phương pháp đã chọn cạnh nhau; những hàng khác biệt được làm nổi bật.
| Thang đo Năng lực Hấp thụ× | Thước đo Sức bền Tổ chức× | |
|---|---|---|
| Lĩnh vực | Quản trị chiến lược | Quản trị chiến lược |
| Họ | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Năm ra đời≠ | 2002 | 2007 |
| Người khởi xướng≠ | Shaker Zahra and Gerard George | Karl Weick, Kathleen Sutcliffe, and subsequent organizational scholars |
| Loại | Organizational self-report questionnaire | Organizational self-report questionnaire |
| Công trình gốc≠ | Zahra, S. A., & George, G. (2002). Absorptive capacity: A review, reconceptualization, and extension. Academy of Management Review, 27(2), 185–203. DOI ↗ | Weick, K. E., & Sutcliffe, K. M. (2007). Managing the unexpected: Resilient performance in an age of uncertainty. Jossey-Bass. link ↗ |
| Tên gọi khác≠ | ACAP, Zahra-George Scale | Resilience Scale, Organizational Adaptability Scale, Crisis Preparedness Scale |
| Liên quan | 5 | 5 |
| Tóm tắt≠ | Absorptive Capacity (ACAP) refers to an organization's ability to acquire, assimilate, transform, and exploit external knowledge to enhance innovation and performance. Zahra and George (2002) reconceptualized absorptive capacity into four distinct but interrelated processes in their foundational Academy of Management Review article. This measurement scale captures organizational learning dynamics and knowledge-based competitive advantage, making it essential for assessing innovation capability and knowledge management effectiveness. | Organizational Resilience refers to an organization's capacity to anticipate disruptions, withstand shocks, and adapt effectively to changing circumstances while maintaining core identity and functionality. Weick and Sutcliffe (2007) argue that resilience is not primarily about avoiding disruption but about developing capability to sense threats early, respond rapidly, and learn from shocks. The COVID-19 pandemic exposed organizational resilience gaps: firms with diversified supply chains, flexible workforce arrangements, and adaptive cultures recovered faster than those with fragile, optimized-for-efficiency structures. This scale measures organizational resilience across three dimensions: readiness (preparation for uncertainty), response capability (speed and agility in crisis), and adaptive learning (capturing and applying lessons). |
| ScholarGateBộ dữ liệu ↗ |
|
|