ScholarGate
Асистент

Порівняння методів

Переглядайте обрані методи поруч; рядки з відмінностями підсвічено.

Динамічне зіставлення за показником схильності×Зважування за показником схильності (PSW / IPW)×
ГалузьПричинно-наслідковий висновокПричинно-наслідковий висновок
РодинаRegression modelRegression model
Рік появи1986-20101983 (propensity score); 2003 (efficient IPW estimator)
Автор методуRobins (1986) on sequential treatments; Lechner & Miquel (2010) on dynamic matchingRosenbaum & Rubin (propensity score); Hirano, Imbens & Ridder (efficient weighting)
ТипSequential causal matchingCausal inference / reweighting
Основоположне джерелоLechner, M., & Miquel, R. (2010). Identification of the effects of dynamic treatments by sequential conditional independence assumptions. Empirical Economics, 39(1), 111-137. DOI ↗Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70(1), 41-55. DOI ↗
Інші назвиdynamic PSM, sequential propensity score matching, longitudinal propensity matching, DPSMPSW, inverse probability weighting, IPW, propensity-based weighting
Пов'язані66
ПідсумокDynamic Propensity Score Matching (DPSM) extends classic propensity score matching to settings where treatment is assigned repeatedly over time and earlier treatment choices influence later ones. It estimates the causal effect of entire treatment sequences or regime changes by constructing matched comparisons at each decision point using the full history of covariates and prior treatments.Propensity score weighting is a causal-inference method that reweights observations so that the covariate distributions of treated and untreated units look exchangeable, enabling unbiased estimation of average treatment effects from observational data. Each unit receives a weight that is the inverse of its probability of receiving the treatment it actually received — a strategy formalised by Rosenbaum and Rubin (1983) and given its efficient semiparametric form by Hirano, Imbens and Ridder (2003).
ScholarGateНабір даних
  1. v1
  2. 2 Джерела
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Джерела
  3. PUBLISHED

Перейти до пошуку Завантажити слайди

ScholarGateПорівняння методів: Dynamic Propensity Score Matching · Propensity Score Weighting. Отримано 2026-06-18 з https://scholargate.app/uk/compare