ScholarGate
Asistan
Process / pipelineParty systems / concentration measures

Effective Number of Parties

The effective number of parties is the standard measure of party-system fragmentation, introduced by Markku Laakso and Rein Taagepera in 1979. Rather than simply counting how many parties exist, it weights each party by its relative size, so that a handful of dominant parties count for more than a long tail of negligible ones. Formally it is the reciprocal of the Herfindahl concentration of party shares: N equals one divided by the sum of squared shares. Computed on vote shares it yields the effective number of electoral parties (ENEP); computed on seat shares it yields the effective number of parliamentary parties (ENPP). The index gives a single, intuitive number — roughly the count of equally sized parties that would produce the observed concentration — and is the workhorse for describing and comparing party systems.

MethodMind'de açYakındaUygula, karşılaştır, rehberlik al
Araçlar & kaynaklar
Slaytları indir
Öğren & keşfet
VideoYakında

Tam yöntemi oku

Yalnızca üyeler

Bu bölümü okumak için ücretsiz hesapla giriş yapın.

Giriş yap

Yöntem haritası

İlişkili yöntemlerin komşuluğu — keşfetmek için bir düğüm seçin.

Kaynaklar

  1. Laakso, M., & Taagepera, R. (1979). Effective Number of Parties: A Measure with Application to West Europe. Comparative Political Studies, 12(1), 3-27. DOI: 10.1177/001041407901200101

Bu sayfayı kaynak gösterin

ScholarGate. (2026, June 22). Laakso-Taagepera Effective Number of Parties Index. ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/tr/political-economy/effective-number-of-parties

Hangi yöntem?

Bu yöntemi en yakın akrabalarının yanına koyup yan yana okuyun — kütüphane kitapları masaya serer; seçim sizindir.

Yan yana karşılaştır

Bu yönteme atıf yapanlar

ScholarGateEffective Number of Parties (Laakso-Taagepera Effective Number of Parties Index). 2026-06-24 tarihinde şu adresten erişildi: https://scholargate.app/tr/political-economy/effective-number-of-parties · Veri seti: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20539026