ScholarGate
ผู้ช่วย

เปรียบเทียบวิธี

ดูวิธีที่เลือกเทียบกันแบบเคียงข้าง แถวที่ต่างกันจะถูกเน้นไว้

กลยุทธ์การสืบค้นอย่างเป็นระบบ×ตัวดำเนินการค้นหาแบบบูลีน×การวิเคราะห์การอ้างอิง×
สาขาวิชาทักษะการวิจัยทักษะการวิจัยทักษะการวิจัย
ตระกูลProcess / pipelineProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
ปีกำเนิด1990s (formalized in Cochrane methodology)1847 (Boolean algebra); 1960s (database applications)1955 (citation indexes); 1975 (Impact Factor); 2005 (H-index)
ผู้ริเริ่มCochrane Collaboration and systematic review methodologistsGeorge Boole and IT information retrieval practitionersEugene Garfield (Citation Indexes, 1955); Jorge Hirsch (H-index, 2005)
ประเภทFrameworkToolTool
แหล่งต้นตำรับMoher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., & Altman, D. G. (2009). Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA statement. PLoS Medicine, 6(7), e1000097. DOI ↗Wilkinson, M. D., Sansone, S. A., Vandervalk, B., & Rocca-Serra, P. (2011). Evaluating information retrieval systems: a guide for researchers. Expert Review of Molecular Diagnostics, 11(2), 181–190. link ↗Hirsch, J. E. (2005). An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 102(46), 16569–16572. DOI ↗
ชื่อเรียกอื่นsearch protocol, systematic search, comprehensive search strategyBoolean logic, Boolean search, AND OR NOTcitation metrics, bibliometric analysis, citation tracking
ที่เกี่ยวข้อง324
สรุปA systematic search strategy is a comprehensive, transparent protocol for retrieving all relevant literature addressing a well-defined research question. Developed by the Cochrane Collaboration and formalized in guidelines like PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses), systematic search strategies are essential for conducting unbiased literature reviews, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses. Unlike ad hoc searches (searching Google Scholar or PubMed without a protocol), systematic searches document every step—which databases were searched, what search terms were used, how many results were retrieved, and what inclusion/exclusion criteria were applied—enabling other researchers to reproduce the search and verify that no relevant studies were missed.Boolean search operators are logical functions—AND, OR, NOT, and parentheses—used to combine and filter search terms in bibliographic databases, library catalogs, and search engines. Named after mathematician George Boole (1815–1864), Boolean logic has been applied to information retrieval since the 1960s. These operators allow researchers to construct complex, precise searches that retrieve only articles meeting specific combinations of criteria, dramatically improving search efficiency and reducing irrelevant results.Citation analysis is the systematic study of how scholarly works are cited by subsequent research, used as a proxy for research impact and influence. Founded formally by Eugene Garfield in 1955 (introducing citation indexes), the field encompasses metrics ranging from simple citation counts to sophisticated indices like the H-index (Hirsch, 2005) and field-normalized indicators. Citation analysis is used to evaluate researcher productivity, track influence of ideas, assess journal quality, and detect research trends. While citation counts are not perfect measures of quality (high citation does not equal high quality; time lag in citation accumulation), they provide valuable quantitative data for research evaluation alongside peer review and expert assessment.
ScholarGateชุดข้อมูล
  1. v1
  2. 3 แหล่งอ้างอิง
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 แหล่งอ้างอิง
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 แหล่งอ้างอิง
  3. PUBLISHED

ไปที่หน้าค้นหา ดาวน์โหลดสไลด์

ScholarGateเปรียบเทียบวิธี: Systematic Search Strategy · Boolean Search Operators · Citation Analysis. สืบค้นเมื่อ 2026-06-19 จาก https://scholargate.app/th/compare