ScholarGate
ผู้ช่วย

เปรียบเทียบวิธี

ดูวิธีที่เลือกเทียบกันแบบเคียงข้าง แถวที่ต่างกันจะถูกเน้นไว้

Self-Anchored Rating Scale×Target Complaint Scaling×
สาขาวิชาSocial WorkSocial Work
ตระกูลProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
ปีกำเนิด20091966
ผู้ริเริ่มCodified in social-work practice evaluation by Bloom, Fischer & OrmeCarolyn C. Battle, Jerome D. Frank & colleagues (Johns Hopkins)
ประเภทIndividualized self-report rating scale with client-defined anchorsIndividualized outcome measure based on client-elicited presenting complaints
แหล่งต้นตำรับBloom, M., Fischer, J., & Orme, J. G. (2009). Evaluating Practice: Guidelines for the Accountable Professional (6th ed.). Pearson/Allyn & Bacon. ISBN: 9780205458066Battle, C. C., Imber, S. D., Hoehn-Saric, R., Stone, A. R., Nash, E. R., & Frank, J. D. (1966). Target complaints as criteria of improvement. American Journal of Psychotherapy, 20(1), 184–192. DOI ↗
ชื่อเรียกอื่นSARS, Self-Anchored Scale, Individualized Rating Scale, Client-Anchored ScaleTarget Complaints, Target Complaint Method, Battle Target Complaints, Target Problem Scaling
ที่เกี่ยวข้อง44
สรุปA self-anchored rating scale (SARS) is an individualized measurement tool in which a client rates a personally relevant target — a feeling, thought, or behavior that may not be captured by any standardized instrument — on a fixed numeric scale whose points the client and worker have anchored in advance with concrete, individually meaningful descriptions. Widely taught in social-work practice evaluation through Bloom, Fischer, and Orme's work, it lets a worker measure highly idiosyncratic internal states repeatedly and reliably, supplying the data for single-system designs when no off-the-shelf scale fits.Target complaint scaling is an individualized outcome measure in which the client names the specific complaints that brought them to treatment, each complaint is rated for severity at the outset and again at follow-up, and the change in those ratings indexes improvement. Introduced by Carolyn Battle, Jerome Frank, and colleagues at Johns Hopkins in 1966, it grounds outcome measurement in the client's own presenting problems rather than a fixed questionnaire, making it an early and influential model for person-centered, idiographic outcome assessment in psychotherapy and social work.
ScholarGateชุดข้อมูล
  1. v1
  2. 2 แหล่งอ้างอิง
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 แหล่งอ้างอิง
  3. PUBLISHED

ไปที่หน้าค้นหา ดาวน์โหลดสไลด์

ScholarGateเปรียบเทียบวิธี: Self-Anchored Rating Scale · Target Complaint Scaling. สืบค้นเมื่อ 2026-06-25 จาก https://scholargate.app/th/compare