เปรียบเทียบวิธี
ดูวิธีที่เลือกเทียบกันแบบเคียงข้าง แถวที่ต่างกันจะถูกเน้นไว้
| การวิเคราะห์ใจความแบบสะท้อนคิด× | การวิเคราะห์วาทกรรม× | |
|---|---|---|
| สาขาวิชา≠ | เชิงคุณภาพ | การวิจัยเชิงคุณภาพ |
| ตระกูล | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| ปีกำเนิด≠ | 2006 (seminal paper); explicitly named 'reflexive' from ~2019 | 1989 (Fairclough); 1987 (Potter & Wetherell) |
| ผู้ริเริ่ม≠ | Virginia Braun & Victoria Clarke | Norman Fairclough; Jonathan Potter and Margaret Wetherell |
| ประเภท≠ | Qualitative research method | Method |
| แหล่งต้นตำรับ≠ | Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. DOI ↗ | Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and power. Longman. link ↗ |
| ชื่อเรียกอื่น≠ | RTA, reflexive TA, Braun and Clarke thematic analysis, qualitative thematic analysis | DA, Critical Discourse Analysis, Discursive Analysis |
| ที่เกี่ยวข้อง≠ | 6 | 2 |
| สรุป≠ | Reflexive Thematic Analysis (RTA) is a widely used qualitative method for identifying, analysing, and interpreting patterns of shared meaning — called themes — across a dataset. Developed by Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke, it is theoretically flexible, works across epistemological positions, and foregrounds the researcher's active, interpretive role rather than treating themes as features that simply emerge from data. It differs from older 'codebook' approaches by treating the analyst's subjectivity as a resource rather than a source of bias to be suppressed. | Discourse analysis is a qualitative research methodology that examines how language, communication, and power shape meaning, identity, and social reality. Developed across linguistics, sociology, and psychology (particularly by Norman Fairclough and Jonathan Potter), discourse analysis goes beyond content to analyze language use as a social practice that constitutes and reflects power relations, ideologies, and social structures. |
| ScholarGateชุดข้อมูล ↗ |
|
|