เปรียบเทียบวิธี

	การออกแบบวิจัยแบบผสมผสานเชิงปฏิบัติ (Pragmatic Mixed Methods Design)	การออกแบบการวิจัยแบบหลายเฟสและหลายวิธี
สาขาวิชา	การออกแบบการวิจัย	การออกแบบการวิจัย
ตระกูล	Process / pipeline	Process / pipeline
ปีกำเนิด	Early 2000s (formalised); pragmatism as philosophy late 19th–early 20th century	2007 (first edition of Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research)
ผู้ริเริ่ม	John W. Creswell & Vicki L. Plano Clark (formalised); philosophical grounding in William James, John Dewey, Richard Rorty	John W. Creswell & Vicki L. Plano Clark
ประเภท	Mixed methods research design	Mixed methods research design
แหล่งต้นตำรับ	Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications. ISBN: 978-1483344379	Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research (3rd ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-1483substitute
ชื่อเรียกอื่น	pragmatic MMR, pragmatism-guided mixed methods, pragmatic inquiry design, practical mixed methods	multiphase design, multiproject mixed methods, programmatic mixed methods, multistage mixed methods
ที่เกี่ยวข้อง	6	6
สรุป	Pragmatic mixed methods design is a research approach that selects and combines quantitative and qualitative methods based on what best answers the research question, rather than adhering to a single philosophical paradigm. Rooted in the philosophical tradition of pragmatism — associated with William James, John Dewey, and later Richard Rorty — it treats methodological fit and practical utility as the primary criteria for design decisions. The approach is endorsed by leading mixed methods scholars including Creswell and Plano Clark as the most common philosophical worldview underpinning mixed methods work.	The multiphase mixed methods design is a sustained research program in which quantitative and qualitative strands are combined across three or more sequential phases — or across multiple related projects — to address a central program objective. Each phase builds on the prior phase's findings, making the design well-suited to long-term evaluation, intervention development, and large-scale program assessment where a single data-collection cycle cannot fully address the complexity of the research problem.