ScholarGate
ผู้ช่วย

เปรียบเทียบวิธี

ดูวิธีที่เลือกเทียบกันแบบเคียงข้าง แถวที่ต่างกันจะถูกเน้นไว้

มาตรวัดประสิทธิผลทางการเมือง×มาตรวัดการมีส่วนร่วมทางการเมือง×มาตรวัดความรู้สึกไม่ไว้วางใจนักการเมือง (Voter Cynicism Scale)×
สาขาวิชาจิตวิทยาการเมืองจิตวิทยาการเมืองจิตวิทยาการเมือง
ตระกูลProcess / pipelineProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
ปีกำเนิด196919951960
ผู้ริเริ่มRichard Niemi, Steven Craig, Albert BanduraSidney Verba, Kay Lehman Schlozman, Henry BradyAngus Campbell et al.
ประเภทSelf-reportSelf-reportSelf-report
แหล่งต้นตำรับNiemi, R. G., Craig, S. C., & Mattei, F. (1991). Measuring internal political efficacy in the 1988 National Election Study. American Political Science Review, 85(4), 1407-1413. DOI ↗Verba, S., Schlozman, K. L., & Brady, H. E. (1995). Voice and equality: Civic voluntarism in American politics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. link ↗Campbell, A., Converse, P. E., Miller, W. E., & Stokes, D. E. (1960). The American voter. New York: John Wiley & Sons. link ↗
ชื่อเรียกอื่นPolitical Efficacy, Internal Efficacy, External EfficacyPPCS, Civic Participation Measure, Political Activity ScalePCS, Political Efficacy Cynicism, Electoral System Cynicism
ที่เกี่ยวข้อง333
สรุปPolitical efficacy measures sense of personal agency and power in the political system, encompassing both internal efficacy (belief in own political competence and understanding) and external efficacy (belief that the political system is responsive to citizen input). Rooted in Bandura's self-efficacy theory (1977) and developed for political contexts by Niemi, Craig, and colleagues (1969 onwards), the measure explains why some citizens feel empowered to engage in politics while others feel powerless. High-efficacy citizens are substantially more likely to participate, contact representatives, and vote; low-efficacy citizens withdraw from politics and are susceptible to anti-democratic appeals.The Political Participation Scale measures engagement in civic and political activities, encompassing voting, campaign involvement, contacting officials, organizational membership, community volunteering, and protest activity. Developed by Verba, Schlozman, and Brady (1995), the measure captures both conventional participation (voting, contacting representatives) and unconventional participation (protest, civil disobedience). It addresses fundamental questions in political science: Why do some citizens engage while others withdraw? How do structural resources (time, money, education) and psychological factors (efficacy, interest) drive participation?The Voter Cynicism Scale measures citizen skepticism and disillusionment regarding the political process, including beliefs that the electoral system is rigged, politicians are self-serving, and voting does not matter. The measure captures a pessimistic orientation toward electoral democracy distinct from distrust in institutions (which can coexist with belief in democratic potential) or political alienation. Rooted in Campbell et al.'s American Voter (1960) tradition of measuring political efficacy and cynicism, the scale remains central to understanding voter turnout decline, support for populist alternatives, and democratic legitimacy crises.
ScholarGateชุดข้อมูล
  1. v1
  2. 3 แหล่งอ้างอิง
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 แหล่งอ้างอิง
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 แหล่งอ้างอิง
  3. PUBLISHED

ไปที่หน้าค้นหา ดาวน์โหลดสไลด์

ScholarGateเปรียบเทียบวิธี: Political Efficacy Scale · Political Participation Scale · Voter Cynicism Scale. สืบค้นเมื่อ 2026-06-20 จาก https://scholargate.app/th/compare