เปรียบเทียบวิธี
ดูวิธีที่เลือกเทียบกันแบบเคียงข้าง แถวที่ต่างกันจะถูกเน้นไว้
| การสัมภาษณ์เชิงลึกแบบหลายแหล่งข้อมูล× | การสนทนากลุ่มแบบหลายแหล่งข้อมูล× | |
|---|---|---|
| สาขาวิชา | ระเบียบวิธีสำรวจ | ระเบียบวิธีสำรวจ |
| ตระกูล | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| ปีกำเนิด≠ | 1980s–1990s (formalized in qualitative inquiry literature) | 1980s–1990s |
| ผู้ริเริ่ม≠ | Grounded in qualitative traditions consolidated by Patton, Lincoln & Guba, and others | Developed from focus group methodology; formalized in applied social research (Krueger, Morgan, and colleagues) |
| ประเภท | Qualitative data collection technique | Qualitative data collection technique |
| แหล่งต้นตำรับ≠ | Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods (3rd ed.). Sage Publications. ISBN: 978-0761919711 | Krueger, R. A., & Casey, M. A. (2015). Focus Groups: A Practical Guide for Applied Research (5th ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-1483365244 |
| ชื่อเรียกอื่น | multi-informant in-depth interview, multi-perspective qualitative interview, multiple-source IDI, multi-stakeholder in-depth interview | multi-stakeholder focus group, multiple-source focus group, cross-source focus group, MSFG |
| ที่เกี่ยวข้อง≠ | 5 | 4 |
| สรุป≠ | The multi-source in-depth interview is a qualitative data collection strategy in which extended, open-ended interviews are conducted with participants drawn from two or more distinct source groups — such as providers and clients, managers and staff, or experts and laypeople. Collecting data across diverse informant positions enriches description and enables the researcher to examine a phenomenon from multiple vantage points within a single study. | The multi-source focus group method extends the standard focus group design by deliberately recruiting participants from two or more distinct stakeholder groups — for example, clinicians and patients, teachers and students, or managers and frontline staff. Separate sessions are held for each source group using a shared discussion protocol, and the resulting data are analyzed both within each group and across groups to reveal convergences, tensions, and perspectives that no single-source design could uncover. |
| ScholarGateชุดข้อมูล ↗ |
|
|