เปรียบเทียบวิธี

	แบบวัดทัศนคติการปฏิบัติงานโดยอาศัยหลักฐานเชิงประจักษ์ (EBPAS-36)	Implementation Climate Scale (ICS)
สาขาวิชา	วิทยาการนำไปปฏิบัติ	วิทยาการนำไปปฏิบัติ
ตระกูล	Process / pipeline	Process / pipeline
ปีกำเนิด	2005	2014
ผู้ริเริ่ม	Gregory A. Aarons, PhD	Michelle G. Ehrhart, PhD; Gregory A. Aarons, PhD; Lydia R. Farahnak, PhD
ประเภท	Self-report questionnaire	Self-report organizational survey
แหล่งต้นตำรับ	Aarons, G. A. (2011). Evidence-Based Practice Attitude Scale-50 (EBPAS-50) and EBPAS-36 short form: Psychometric properties. Implementation Science, 6(1), 89.	Ehrhart, M. G., Aarons, G. A., & Farahnak, L. R. (2014). Assessing the organizational context for EBP implementation: The Development and Validity Testing of the Implementation Climate Scale (ICS). Implementation Science, 9, 157.
ชื่อเรียกอื่น	EBPAS, EBPAS-36, Evidence-Based Practice Attitude	ICS, Implementation Climate, Implementation Climate Scale-4
ที่เกี่ยวข้อง	5	5
สรุป	The EBPAS-36 is a 36-item self-report questionnaire that assesses clinicians' and organizational leaders' attitudes toward adopting and implementing evidence-based practices (EBP). Developed by Aarons in 2005 and refined through multiple validation studies, it measures four core dimensions: perceived requirements to adopt EBP, the appeal and usefulness of EBP to individual practice, organizational openness to innovation, and perceived divergence between current practice and EBP requirements. The EBPAS is widely used in healthcare, mental health, child welfare, and substance abuse treatment settings to predict adoption readiness and guide implementation planning.	The Implementation Climate Scale (ICS) is a brief organizational assessment tool that measures the extent to which an organization's work climate, policies, and systems are aligned with and supportive of evidence-based practice (EBP) implementation. Developed by Ehrhart, Aarons, and Farahnak in 2014, the ICS measures four dimensions of organizational implementation climate: Focus (degree to which EBP is a priority in organizational goals), Support (availability of resources and protected time for EBP), Reward (incentive structures and recognition for EBP use), and Expectations (leadership communication of expectations for EBP adoption and fidelity). The ICS provides a concise snapshot of whether organizational systems and policies actively facilitate or hinder EBP uptake, and has demonstrated strong predictive validity for implementation fidelity and sustainability.